Evaluation of E-Learning Governance Using COBIT 2019 DSS at Universitas Indonesia Mandiri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32492/jeetech.v7i2.7201Keywords:
COBIT 2019, E-learning Governance, DSS Domain, Capability Level, Gap AnalysisAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the governance of e-learning services using the COBIT 2019 framework, specifically within the Deliver, Service, and Support (DSS) domain. The research adopts a quantitative evaluative approach with a cross-sectional design, where data were collected from 30 respondents consisting of IT staff, lecturers, and students using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted through validity and reliability testing, capability level measurement, and gap analysis. The results show that all questionnaire items are valid and reliable, indicating that the instrument is suitable for measuring e-learning governance. The capability level analysis reveals an average score of 3.34, corresponding to Level 3 (Established Process). This indicates that governance processes have been implemented in a structured and consistent manner, although they have not yet reached the optimal level. The gap analysis shows that most DSS subdomains have a gap value of 2 compared to the target Level 5 (Optimizing Process), indicating the need for further improvement. The largest gaps are identified in incident management, problem management, service continuity, and business process control, suggesting that governance practices are still predominantly reactive. Therefore, organizations are encouraged to strengthen proactive governance through continuous improvement, integrated monitoring, and data-driven decision-making. This study provides practical insights for improving e-learning service governance and supports decision-making in higher education institutions. However, the findings are based on respondents’ perceptions and a cross-sectional design, which may not fully capture dynamic changes over time.
References
F. Wang, J. Lv, and X. Zhao, “How do information strategy and information technology governance influence firm performance ?,” no. December, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023697.
C. Juiz, F. Duhamel, I. Guti, and L. F. Luna-reyes, “IT Managers ’ Framing of IT Governance Roles and Responsibilities in Ibero-American Higher Education Institutions,” 2022.
M. Elazhary, A. Popovič, P. Henrique, and D. S. Bermejo, “How Information Technology Governance Influences Organizational Agility : The Role of Market Turbulence How Information Technology Governance Influences Organizational Agility : The Role of Market Turbulence,” Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10580530.2022.2055813.
K. Werder, “A meta-analysis on the effects of IT capability toward agility and performance : New directions for information systems research,” pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268761.
S. Luis, “Delft University of Technology Data governance Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ’ You share , we take care !’ - Taverne project Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section : the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public .,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 101493, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493.
I. S. Bianchi, “Information Technology Governance for Higher Education Institutions: A Multi-Country Study,” pp. 1–28, 2022.
A. Tarhini and K. Hone, “Examining factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in higher education,” 2021.
S. I. Maebari, “Evaluasi e-learning COBIT,” KLIK, 2023.
S. Ali and P. Green, “Determinants of Effective IT governance Mechanisms,” in proceedings of International IT Governance Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 2005.
A. Joshi, L. Bollen, H. Hassink, S. De Haes, and W. Van Grembergen, “Explaining IT Governance Disclosure through the Constructs of IT Governance Maturity and IT Strategic Role,” Inf. Manag., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 368–380, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2017.09.003.
M. Kerangka, K. Cobit, and D. Dss, “Audit manajemen masalah teknologi informasi menggunakan kerangka kerja cobit 2019 domain dss03,” vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 839–846, 2023.
M. Rodi, A. H. Muhammad, and A. Nasiri, “Perancangan Tata Kelola Ti Menggunakan Cobit 2019 Untuk Pengembangan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Bagi Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kasus: Lppm Stmik Lombok),” J. Manaj. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 134–147, 2023.
N. Butarbutar and A. R. Tanaamah, “Analisis Manajemen Risiko Menggunakan COBIT 5 Domain APO12 ( Studi Kasus : Yayasan Bina Darma ),” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 352–362, 2021.
B. D. Tarbiyatuzzahrah, R. Mulyana, and A. F. Santoso, “JTIM : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia Penggunaan COBIT 2019 GMO dalam Menyusun Pengelolaan Layanan TI Prioritas pada Transformasi Digital BankCo,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 218–238, 2023.
D. Utomo, M. Wijaya, N. Tri, and M. Sagala, “Leveraging COBIT 2019 to Implement IT Governance in SME Context : A Case Study of Higher Education in Campus A,” vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 2022.
D. Pramana, N. Made, R. Masita, and O. K. Putra, “Evaluasi Tata Kelola TI Office 365 pada ITB STIKOM Bali menggunakan Framework COBIT 5,” pp. 104–112, 2022.
C. Wilkin, “IT governance effectiveness and organizational performance: Evidence from higher education institutions,” 2020.
M. A. Firdaus, “Audit sistem informasi e-learning menggunakan framework COBIT 2019 domain DSS,” 2025.
ISACA, “COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology,” 2022.
Sugiyono, Buku Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (kuantitatif,kualitatif,kombinasi R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan. 2021.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, “Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.),” Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publ., 2023.
F. Saputro, “Evaluasi tata kelola TI menggunakan COBIT 2019,” 2025.
W. Van Grembergen, “Enterprise governance of information technology,” 2009.
T. M. Ober, M. R. Hong, D. A. Rebouças-Ju, M. F. Carter, C. Liu, and Y. Cheng, “Linking self-report and process data to performance as measured by different assessment types,” Comput. Educ., vol. 167, p. 104188, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104188.
L. Han, F. Gao, X. Hou, D. Xie, M. Jou, and C.-C. Huang, “Do covered nude photographs in the internet induce sexual cognition – A study of event-related potential,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 80, pp. 370–378, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.039.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Sella Andira Bintang Wulandari, Agus Komarudin, Ribut Julianto , Muawan Bisri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
